The Inevitable Rise of Progressive Christianity

The following originally appeared on John Shore's Blog, 9/19/11
It is inevitable that Christians who would now be described as “liberal” will be the overwhelming majority of Christians in America. That sea change, the waters of which we already feel swelling everywhere around us, can no sooner be stopped than can the moon passing across the night sky. Today’s conservative evangelical Christians who are rallying against “postmodern relativism,” “revisionist secular theology,” “a naturalistic doctrine of God,” or however else they might label the theology of the left, are like yesterday’s horse-and-buggy owners rallying against the newfangled automobile.
The future of transportation was obvious then; the future of Christian theology is obvious now.
Please note the difference between “inevitable” and “good.” I’m not saying that the rise of the Christian left is a good thing (though I personally believe that it is). I’m saying it’s inevitable. And the reason that’s true is as obvious as a Buick parked in your living room.
In the old days, it was easy for the vast majority of American Christians to believe that, say, Jews and homosexuals (to name but two of the many, many groups Christians traditionally so destine) are going to hell. And what made it so emotionally and spiritually comfortable for so many Christians to assert that? Because none of them knew any Jews or homosexuals. No Jews or gays had a nearby farm; no Jews or gays were at the county fair; no Jews or gays attended the local PTA meetings; you never ran into either at the hardware store. The Jews were (however involuntarily) sequestering themselves in places like New York City; and while you may have interacted with a gay man over in the pipes department, that was his secret.
As far as most Americans knew (or, of course, cared to know), white was right, God shed his grace upon them, and happy days were afoot.
That was yesterday. Today most people have in their lives, and deeply care for, at least one person who is no closer to being a Protestant Christian than I am to being French Canadian. Today everyone is related to, shares a neighborhood with, works with, or goes to school with someone who is gay, Jewish, Muslim, Catholic, Buddhist, Sikh, Hindu, Mormon, Unitarian Universalism, Wiccan, Native American, Shinto, Baha’i, Rastafarian, Cao Dai, Tenrikyo, agnostic, atheist, or any combination thereof. (Humans. We are a creative group, are we not?)
It’s a great deal more troubling to condemn to hell someone for whom you have affection than it is an abstract member of an abstract group. Growing up in my white suburban neighborhood, I didn’t know a single person who was Hindu. Today there are five young men who are Hindu living right next door to me. Those young men have become friends. If part of my theology insists that my Hindu friends are going to hell, you better believe I’m going to reassess that part of my theology. I wouldn’t be human if I didn’t.
It’s typical to think that theology is static and permanent. It’s not, though. What’s true instead is that theology follows sociology. And slowly but surely we are all becoming members of one big society. At the very least media generally, and the Internet in particular, has made world travelers, and culture tourists, of us all.
The world is rapidly changing. And as surely as one day follows the next, Christian theology, as it always has (slavery, anyone?) will change right along with it. As our world grows smaller, our Christianity will grow larger, broader, more inclusive.
Last month the Public Religion Research Institute found that 44 percent of young evangelicals between the ages of 18 and 29 support gay marriage. It also found that 52 percent of all Catholics—despite the explicit teachings of the Catholic church—favor same-sex marriage.
Polls consistently now show that in America support for gay marriage is no longer the minority opinion.
This past May, Focus on the Family President Jim Daly said this in an interview with WORLD magazine:
"We’re losing on [the issue of homosexuality], especially among the 20- and 30-somethings: 65 to 70 percent of them favor same-sex marriage. …. We’ve probably lost that. I don’t want to be extremist here, but I think we need to start calculating where we are in the culture."
When the president of Focus on the Family basically gives up on the gay issue, you know things have changed.
I’m on the board of a group called The Christian Left, whose Facebook page grows by about 300 new members a week.
That’s no trend. That’s the future. (Also, 350 people in the last couple of weeks have joined ThruWay Christians.)
The religious right can rail, and scream, and protest all it wants that (to quote Albert Mohler) “Liberalism just does not work.” Mohler may be perfectly correct. I personally believe that he is not; I think that assertion reveals a sad lack of faith in the enduring nature of human goodness.
Either way, one thing is certain: We—and certainly our children—will find out.
_______________
Dan Savage has declared John Shore "America's leading non-douchey Christian"; Rob Bell ("Love Wins") has called him "an awesome, brilliant writer." John blogs at JohnShore.com and for "The Huffington Post." He invites you to "like" his Facebook page.










Comments
God
No one can prove their take on God is the most accurate one (no faith movement, and no individual person of faith). God may be a living entitiy in your life, and I totally get that, but one cannot intelligently claim that God is this or that. God is either felt in one's life or is not. It is up to each one of us how we allow and understand God to enter our life. Byron Katie says "God is Reality. Do you believe in Reality?"
There is no intelligence behind trying to convince another human being that your definition of any sort of anthropomorphic God holds weight.
The real and benevolent force in the universe, which supports and answers your earnest and focused plan toward what is meaningful to pursue in your life, is where "God" lies. Some call it reality, and some frame it according to ancient scriptures.
Frame it any way you want. But don't put a ridiculous, supernatural spin on it, and don't isolate this entity as something outside of oneself or outside of the natural force contained within all things.
God doesn't send people to Hell
God doesn't send anybody to hell because he wants to, he actually doesn't want any human to go to hell, He loves us, this is not a cultural thing, it is a Heavenly matter. But because God is Holy and Just he must condemn the sin of the world, and the Bible says that the wages of sin is death ; so if God didn't condenm sin ,He would not be Holy, He must do it as well as a good judge would sentence a criminal in court. But because God doesn't want anybody to perish but have eternal life with Him in Heaven, He sent Jesus and put on his shoulders all the sin of the world and the debt was paid by his own blood. Salvation is a free gift for us, the only thing we need to do is accept it!. God gave all humanity a way out!, a path to Heaven,this is not limited to christians this is for all people on earth who will accept Jesus as their Savior and his gift of eternal life . So it is up to us whether to accept it or not . All people can be saved from Hell. Our debt to God was paid in full.
(Sorry for the grammar errors, english is not my first language)
Grace and Truth
Even your hypothesis is missing the truth. Progressives are full of self-proclaimed Grace, but don't compare their tithing to Evangelicals unless you want to know the Truth. The Truth will set you free. That's biblical and the Truth. To be Christlike, you must balance Truth and Grace. Also biblical, unless you are reading a Progressive bible.
Oh, good,
the crazy has arrived.
Hope
Thank you for this post. I feel I am surrounded by those on the right but seeing the rising waters you describe. I can't wait for the day that I do not feel like I have to leave the faith to be faithful. Your post gave me hope that it will not be long.
Inevitable Sometimes
Biblical theology is progressive when it is rooted in the prophetic tradition argues Walter Brueggemann (The Prophetic Imagination). Yet, Brueggemann points out that a "royal consciousness" - is also found in the kingly traditions. Fundamentalism seems more fond of the latter. Brueggemann places Jesus squarely in the prophetic tradition, whereas - again the fundamentalists trend toward the patriarchal kingly tradition (hierarchical power structures). The liberation theologians of south America (Gutierez and Boff), are 30 years ahead of us in the USA. But, now as the economics and politics of power concentrated in the global corporations, the US is starting to awaken to similar struggles as we find ourselves in what Michel Chossudovsky calls "The Globalization of Poverty." And now the politicians on both parts of the spectrum are theologians - although much more weighted on the fundamentalist side in the GOP tea party.
Subjective vs. Objective
James: I would argue that you've confused subjective with objective knowledge. You said, "The truth is the truth." True enough! But it's only true about truths that are objectively, imperically verifiable. You've tried to make it true about the identity, nature, and purpose of God--which always is, and always will be, strictly subjective concern.
You feeling that your ideas and understandings about God are true? Good.
You feeling that your ideas and understandings are true for everyone else? Bad. Not helpful. Makes for wars, for one.
No degree of passion can change your subjective truth into an objective truth. To believe that it can--to act as if it has--is to commit a profoundly egregious (if, alas, all too common) logical error.
Theology
As a pastor and theologian, James is wrong on many counts. Theology isn't static. What we believe about God today is not the same as it was even 30 years ago. The study of God (theology) is always tinged with human understanding. Our understanding of God changed as our view of the universe changed; with Copernicus, Galileo, Einstein, etc. Our view of the Bible has changed, too. We understand that there are things in the Bible that are culturally driven, such as stoning our children, and are not relevant to the world we live in today. Knowledge of DNA has changed our view of human sexuality and we no longer believe that illness is caused by sin but is caused by germs or viruses.
Just A Quick Response
This is sort of in response to Tom S. and John S. but I wanted to make it quick. So I'll do it in one place, if that's OK.
Tom, you're right that theology isn't static, but you're right because it is our understanding and not God's nature that changes. And, yes, there are aspects of scriptural content that have faded away (thankfully) but they have done so, not because God's nature has changed, but because of the impact of Grace in our relationship with him.
John, you say that I have confused objective and subjective truth. I will, of course, disagree, but only in the sense that I disagree that to be an "objective truth" then an affirmation must be "objectively, imperically verifiable." Once upon a time, the "Celestial Spheres" theory ruled science. And it explained the nature of the universe, better than Galilean approaches. This, then, was an empirically verifiable claim. It was still wrong.
Wonderfully, we are all free (not as Americans, or because of any national affiliation) to believe what we wish to believe, because God has given us liberty to do so. We risk believing affirmations which are not true at our own peril.
God is Who He is without regard to our understanding, preferences or wishes. Truth, is truth in the same way. One's theology may say X about a given topic, while anothers may say Y. If one of them is correct, then we must assume ¬ (P ∧ ¬P). You say I make an egregious logical error, but you neglect the possibility that I may be right.
Exactly, Tom
Exactly right, Tom. Very well said. Thank you.
Theology
The problem with this assertion is that the writer semonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of what theology is and what it is not. The author treats theology as a personal view of God that is malleable and wholly dependent on what a person chooses as right and wrong, good and bad, holy and unholy, etc. In this view, God is what we make God and not what God is without regard to our opinions and/or preferences.
Theology proper, is the study of religious faith, practices, and experiences, yes, but it is primarily the study of God and of God's relation to the world. Which is to say, theology is the study of who God is and not who we want him to be. This is the problem with Progressive Theology (as well as Green Theology, Liberation Theology, et al.). It approaches the understanding and study of God (and Scripture) with an agenda, as oppossed to just trying to understand who God is - or what Scripture says about a particular topic - without regard to a particular previously held worldview or preconceived notions.
It doesn't matter if I know Jews or not (I do), or if I am friends with homosexuals or not (I am. It's impossible to not be friends with homosexuals when you spend your life working in theatre.), or if I am "related to, [share] a neighborhood with, [work] with, or [go] to school with someone who is gay, Jewish, Muslim, Catholic, Buddhist, Sikh, Hindu, Mormon, Unitarian Universalism, Wiccan, Native American, Shinto, Baha’i, Rastafarian, Cao Dai, Tenrikyo, agnostic, atheist, or any combination thereof" (with the exception of Cao Dai and Tenrikyo - as far as I know - I have every one of those covered), the truth is the truth. I can't reshape it to make myself more comfortable. I am called, as each of us are, to search dilligently for the truth no matter what it is or how we feel about it.
All of that is to say, if the truth says things that make us uncomfortable about the state our "gay, Jewish, Muslim, Catholic, Buddhist, Sikh, Hindu, Mormon, Unitarian Universalism, Wiccan, Native American, Shinto, Baha’i, Rastafarian, Cao Dai, Tenrikyo, agnostic, atheist, or any combination thereof" acquaintances, friends, family (or any combination thereof) are in, then it is our obligation to share the truth with them in love, not to make futile attempts to change the truth so that we, and they, feel more comfortable.
Theology
Very well said. As christians we need to change our thoughts and ways to Gods not Gods ways to suit our needs. The hard truth is there are people that we may see as good, but the Bible, Gods word, is very clear. There is One way to heaven. Though Christ alone. There are peoplethat will go to hell. If you can't accept that it is time to reevaluate your own faith. A man that is good in the earthly sence is not always good at heart. God is the judge and only he knows.
I have many friends of different religious backrounds and many that don't believe at all. As much as it pains me to say. I know they won't be in heaven. But we know that, we just don't want to admit it. God is just. Unfortunately, as men, we may not think He is fair but God knows what he is doing.
Discerning the Truth
But what is the truth? We have been indoctrinated over the centuries by many all too humanly motivated interpretations. How are those now set in stone? It gets ever more clear as historical perspective becomes available to the broader population. Questioning is not abandoning. Please see my post re: faithiness -v- faith. Respectfully, Judy D.
Yes, Judy D.
Both of your comments are excellent, Judy. You got it just right. Thanks for taking the time to so well articulate your thoughts.
Faith and Faithiness
It's my impression that the Christian Right clings to having "faith as a little child" and becomes so frightened by enlightened change they react like little children, screaming to drown out what they don't want to hear; bullying to enforce thier view. That, to me, is Faithiness. Faith is knowing and trusting God. There are historical facts that support questioning the indoctrinations we have been subject to on our paths to spiritual relationship with The Creator. Our personal experiences confirm that relationship. We can lean confidently on those while we examine the foibles of Christian history and clear from the path centuries of accumulated debris. I'm very glad to have found this growing community of like minded people. Peace and Loving Empowerment be with us all. Judy D.
Post new comment